investor relations
Institutional Ownership
Corporate Profile
Overview
Corporate Profile
Governance Documents
Officers & Directors
News & Events
News
Event Calendar
Presentations & Publications
Mergers & Acquisitions
Deposit Loan Composition
Covering Analysts
Stock
Stock Information
Stock Splits & Dividends
Stock Purchase Program
Financial Calculators
Report of Organizational Actions IRS form 8937
SEC Filings
Documents
Insider Filings
Insider Ownership
Institutional Ownership
Financial Reports
Financial Highlights
Peer Analysis
As Reported pages
As Reported Charting
Resources
FAQs
Information Request
Email Notification
IR Site Map
Busey.com
Personal
Business
Wealth Management
Mortgage
Ag Services
About Us
Busey Promise
Investor Relations
Careers
Faces of Busey
News & Announcements
Money Matters
Publications
Giving Back to the Communities
Awards & Recognition
Open Search
Close search dialog
Enter search terms
Start Site Search
Busey Bank
☰
IR Menu
×
Ownership > 100%
Copyright
,
© Powered By Q4 Inc.
External Link Notice
You will be linking to another website not owned or operated by Busey Bank. Busey Bank is not responsible for the availability or content of this website and does not represent either the linked website or you, should you enter into a transaction. The inclusion of any hyperlink does not imply any endorsement, investigation, verification or monitoring by Busey Bank of any information in any hyperlinked site. We encourage you to review their privacy and security policies which may differ from Busey Bank.
If you "Proceed", the link will open in a new window.
Ownership > 100%
List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:
Double-counting
- On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.
Short Interest
- A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.
A gap between 'as of' dates
- In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.
Other possible reasons:
a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions;
b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues;
c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.